Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Alive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nominator blocked as a sock and no one else argued for deletion (WP:SKCRIT#4). (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 01:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Alive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG. VladimirBoys (talk) 04:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep I clearly think the nominator didn't do any WP:BEFORE here; this is undeniably one of the most well-known dolls sold from the 70s into the 2000s, and currently an IP with a new television series. Sources are certainly needed, but are easy to find here once you cut pure retail links. The fact we have to detail every damned G.I. Joe figure down to some character named 'Tombstone' no one has ever heard of, but a long-running doll for young girls gets an 🤷🏽‍♀️ from us is something that needs serious rectification here. Nate • (chatter) 08:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This AFD does not fall under a SKCRIT; closest would be SKCRIT3, but that's not obvious to me. No comment on the actual AfD. Sennecaster (Chat) 12:56, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Coverage in reliable sources. Listed in the top 100 toys by Time. Seems easy to me and especially in the context of a Wikipedia preference for "boys" toys. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Question I don't see how this "clearly fails WP:GNG". Could you please specify? Waddles 🗩 🖉 02:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.